Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:22:46 -0500 From: Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna@fuqn.ca> To: Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 or i386 on PE 1850 Intel Xeon with EMT64 Message-ID: <CA62E130-5528-11D9-B4A4-0003930A1676@fuqn.ca> In-Reply-To: <41CB25AE.6050503@snowfall.se> References: <41CB25AE.6050503@snowfall.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 23, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Stefan Cars wrote: > How stable is amd64 on Intel Xeon with EMT64 ? We have a new PE 1850 > with 4GB memory and two dual 2.8 Xeons. Should I go with i386 or amd64 > ? Which one is most stable and what will I gain from amd64 ? I've not had any major issues running on my EM64T system. That being said, I'd probably recommend you run amd64 on it. - -- Jeremy Tregunna jtregunna@fuqn.ca "Under communism, man exploits man. Under capitalism, it's just the opposite." -- J.K. Galbraith -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFByzcqE2T6/THbyegRAhvuAKC2o+NqJxd2J0S/GRHJ/5OVyl9ktACfWg0b 4bfjT9sFEPEi60dZyz0bKhg= =QbRh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA62E130-5528-11D9-B4A4-0003930A1676>