Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:03:08 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 Message-ID: <4CEC563C.80205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <201011212351.oALNpTti096816@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4CE9B77B.20007@FreeBSD.org> <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/22/2010 05:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Doug Barton<dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> As far as I can tell the current state of the code builds just fine, >> so I'm wondering what the current problem with the tinderbox is. > > No weasel words, please. None intended. My post was sent what I felt was a sufficient time after the commit of the fix that I was genuinely curious, especially given the history of c[v]sup related problems on the tinderbox infrastructure. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CEC563C.80205>