Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:03:19 -0500 From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com> To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP Message-ID: <199605221811.NAA03001@sierra.zyzzyva.com> Resent-Message-ID: <199605221811.NAA03001@sierra.zyzzyva.com> In-Reply-To: dennis's message of Wed, 22 May 1996 10:49:27 -0400. <199605221449.KAA26388@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Can anyone, in a nutshell please, give me a simple bullet list of the > most compelling reasons (excluding obscure device support) to > run the SNAP over 2.1R. > > thanks, > > Dennis One of the more interesting things about the -current source tree is the DEVFS. I don't have a feel for how stable it is in the latest SNAP, but something I am looking forward to using. Perhaps someone can comment on it's usefullness/stability?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605221811.NAA03001>