Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:00:04 +0200 From: Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: alc@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/busdma index.sgml Message-ID: <1156161604.670.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060821115140.GD66496@elvis.mu.org> References: <200608211124.k7LBOC1e076436@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060821113456.GC66496@elvis.mu.org> <1156160988.670.8.camel@localhost> <20060821115140.GD66496@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:51 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote: > Joel Dahl wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:34 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote: > > > Joel Dahl wrote: > > > > joel 2006-08-21 11:24:11 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > en/projects/busdma index.sgml > > > > Log: > > > > Add bce, bfe, ixgb, mxgb, nfe, stge and vge. Mark everything as > > > > unknown for now. > > > > > > I took a look at the ixgb(4) driver some time ago and fixed some > > > brokenness that I could spot WRT busdma. As far as I can (could) > > > tell, ixgb(4) should be correctly busdma-ified now, but unfortunately > > > I couldn't ever test this. These NICs are very rare, and the few > > > people who are using those that I could find were using them on > > > x86. > > > > Ok. I'm no expert, but it looks like ixgb is locked and has INTR_MPSAFE > > enabled (alc did some work on this, see rev 1.7 of ixgb.c). Should I > > mark busdma, INTR_MPSAFE and SMPng locked as done? > > Probably not, only busdma should be OK and as I said, it's not even sure > because there have been no tests yet. I think the appropriate thing to > do is to mark the busdma this driver as "Needs testing" for busdma, and > not done for all the rest. Fixed, thanks! -- Joel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1156161604.670.9.camel>