Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:33:01 -0800 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nswap Message-ID: <20030121093301.GB6497@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20030121074128.GA880@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20030117000917.GA7277@laptop.6bone.nl> <20030117232729.GA5908@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030120145205.GA4911@laptop.6bone.nl> <20030120190936.GA3192@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030121074128.GA880@laptop.6bone.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>: > Yes, that is also what I meant. We now have a swapoff() system call that > does all the work itself. > > My idea was to split that up: > > /* turn of swap device */ > static int swapoff_one(struct swdevt *sp) > { > /* Do all things that we don't want to know about outside this function > */ > } > > /* turn off all swap devices */ > int swapoff_all() > { > int index; > struct swdevt *sp; > > for (sp = swdevt, index = 0; index < nswdev; index++, sp++) > swapoff_one(sp); > } > > So the swapoff() system call would call swapoff_one() and my code in > kern/kern_swsuspend.c would call swapoff_all(). See swapoff(8), in particular the -a flag. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030121093301.GB6497>