Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:58:45 +0900 From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: imp@village.org Cc: iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for review: Wildcard entry support Message-ID: <200004031558.AAA01311@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Apr 2000 18:52:34 -0600" <200004030052.SAA56233@harmony.village.org> References: <200004030052.SAA56233@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <200004021407.XAA25683@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> Mitsuru IWASAKI writes: > : Please try this, I'll commit this 2 or 3 days later if no objections. > > This sounds great. But do we need the just in case entries? I think it is better to have them because more than two available config lines are needed if two cards use the same generic entry. Also, I'm expecting that a lot of normal cards can be supported by generic entries and this will cause few new card to be added. In this case, the `just in case' entries make sense. > I was going to suggest this over on the nomads mailing list, after > talking about the VIKING problem, but it looks like you've beaten me > to the punch by actually doing it :-) No, I was not going to beat you :-) Having multiple config lines can solve a part of `No free configuration' problems, but I knew this just recently by tracking down the source code because there is no sample entries like this. # man pccard.conf says; just `There may be multiple config lines' :-< To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004031558.AAA01311>