Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:23:24 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: TTY task group scheduling Message-ID: <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTinHSX1%2Bs3hrHyDeU2Vfp6zekTe04XkHhTc2jtLv@mail.gmail.com> <4CE50849.106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following: > > On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote: > >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. > >> This one's from Linux. > >> > >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1 > > > > Well, > > it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this will make > > it in due time to FreeBSD's kernel. > > Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage pattern > and are greatly over-hyped. you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo. cheers. alex btw: i posted a similar thread on freebsd-backers@, but nobody seemed interested in it. subject line is "sched_autogroup_enabled". > > P.S. What is the due time, BTW? > > -- > Andriy Gapon -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101118182324.GA36312>