Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:18:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210548] audio/pulseaudio: Update to 9.0 Message-ID: <bug-210548-6497-nl6q5hTfOD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210548-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210548-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210548 --- Comment #23 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Created attachment 173073 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D173073&action= =3Dedit Single patch (Update to 9.0 and PORTREVISION bumps for LIB_DEPENDS) Hello Kubilay Kocak. (In reply to comment #22) > I see two patches here (for separate ports) and it is unclear from the hi= story > what is required to progress the issue. The second patch (current attachment #173025) was created because of follow= ing statement in audio/pulseaudio/Makefile file: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/audio/pulseaudio/Makefile?revision=3D= 412344&view=3Dmarkup#l4 -8<-- # !!!NOTE!!! Any PORTVERSION update to this port must be accompanied by # PORTREVISION bumps of depending ports. -->8- The links to ABI tracker for PulseAudio in comment #19 shows, that 8.0 and = 9.0 versions are backward compatible, which means, that there should be no brea= kage for dependent ports (and no requirement for exp-run, I guess). (In reply to comment #22) > I also note that both attachments were created 2016-07-26, which means the > maintainer-timeout period has not passed (for those proposed changes). The new attachments were created because of updates by other committers for related ports. The previous attachments were iterative updates (which didn't change the meaning of the first attachment), because of no feedback from maintainer, but raised issues (e.g. about USES+=3Dlocalbase ssl). (In reply to comment #22) > Can you please combine the attachments into a single unified diff please This is not practical, in my opinion, because the proposed patch for audio/pulseaudio and dependent ports related to different revisions. I submitted second patch for informative purposes (the committer may know what ports needs PORTREVISION bumps, I think), because the possible changes for dependent ports may invalidate some parts of it. Either way, this is just t= wo patch commands, instead of one. I can post single patch, of course. The statement in comment #21 about no maintainer-feedback is still true, as well as for maintainer timeout, based on many unresolved PRs (with gnome@ assignee) currently and closed recently with similar maintainer timeout statement(s). There is no point to do further work on this PR because of th= is (or possible changes by other committers outside of this PR, which may do (= and did) similar things, proposed in this PR). Thanks for your attention. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210548-6497-nl6q5hTfOD>