Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Nov 1998 10:31:58 -0800 (PST)
From:      Ken McGlothlen <mcglk@serv.net>
To:        VEGA <vega@d132-h017.rh.rit.edu>, Steve Friedrich <SteveFriedrich@Hot-Shot.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Plea to core team
Message-ID:  <199811091831.KAA06518@ralf.serv.net>
References:  <199811091737.MAA31468@laker.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811091307020.15459-100000@d132-h017.rh.rit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
vega@d132-h017.rh.rit.edu (VEGA) writes:

| On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Steve Friedrich wrote:
|
| > I wonder if anyone subscribed to -questions besides me thinks that the 3.0R
| > shouldn't have been made generally available.  It is allowing total morons
| > to destroy FreeBSD's reputation due to their incompetence.  [...]
| 
| i have to agree. would i be wrong to assume that it was released only to
| appease the masses who would be outraged if it hadnt been released on october
| 15th? it seems to me that the release was just rushed, to meet a
| pseudo-deadline. it's usable, provided you have experience with problems that
| may occur, but newbies should definitly NOT be using 3.0.

I'd say most experienced system administrators know that no matter how much
bugtesting a major revision to the operating system undergoes, some things only
come out after it gets released.  I, for one, would never use a fresh x.0.0
release on a production system, because I know issues will get discovered over
those first few months.  It's the same reason I didn't upgrade to NT 4.0 on my
NT-box-what-just-sits-there-most-of-the-time until SP2 came out.  (Not that
that made it any better; I should have waited until SP3.)

3.0 was ready to move to the -RELEASE cycle---you can't betatest forever.  And
it's turning up some issues that will get fixed in 3.0.1 on and so forth.  For
myself, I'll probably wait until 3.1.1 before I really upgrade my system.

I think perhaps simply making it clearer what -RELEASE and -STABLE mean on the
home page would help a lot, along with having links to each installation.  But
I don't think that restricting 3.0 is the answer.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811091831.KAA06518>