Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:53:02 -0500 From: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Possible? - FBSD 10 and Apache on CF Soekris? Message-ID: <534C58BE.1030906@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAFS4T6Zd%2B4LvHZrfpp1sKNBy3_q2BTxcMDMsNd72-k7tjNjmmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFS4T6Z_05vqb%2ByQE-OmOAxkrgpkf-S54=2quMv1%2ByTia3TF%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <534BE2ED.6010102@dat.pl> <CAFS4T6ZTJb3E=n24OK3T-mbKDY-jO87cJ6jepRSxbS%2BBMXXuBw@mail.gmail.com> <444n1w55si.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <CAFS4T6Zd%2B4LvHZrfpp1sKNBy3_q2BTxcMDMsNd72-k7tjNjmmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014.04.14 10:51, edflecko . wrote: > Finally, I'm sure I'll be customizing the kernel for Soekris so will > the poudriere > method of keeping the system up to date work for a custom kernel? Ports/packages (third-party software) and the base system are separate. Poudriere will let you build ports on one machine and let others grab the binary packages. I'm not sure what you can do for base, but others might. Fortunately, base does not need updates very often.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?534C58BE.1030906>