Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:33:13 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com>
Cc:        freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: TP-WR1043: trying NFS root
Message-ID:  <20111128093313.GM44498@glebius.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <349DB179-A627-4305-9348-9F3A97C4E1AC@bluezbox.com>
References:  <87527FBF-645E-46F5-A02E-4B62AD648914@lassitu.de> <09F858C3-92A7-4EA7-8745-69F7866AA675@bluezbox.com> <20111128071043.GF44498@glebius.int.ru> <17A73B0C-468D-4BA3-868E-D2E2289A570C@bluezbox.com> <20111128073244.GH44498@glebius.int.ru> <FA975194-8338-480A-A8B7-459DABCC0C9C@bluezbox.com> <20111128082042.GK44498@glebius.int.ru> <349DB179-A627-4305-9348-9F3A97C4E1AC@bluezbox.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:43:50AM -0800, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
O> 
O> On 2011-11-28, at 12:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
O> 
O> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:13:36AM -0800, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
O> > O> 
O> > O> On 2011-11-27, at 11:32 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
O> > O> 
O> > O> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:18:10PM -0800, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
O> > O> > O> > Stefan, Oleksandr,
O> > O> > O> > 
O> > O> > O> > which revisions have you tried? Revisions between r227791 and r227958 are already
O> > O> > O> > known to have problems. Can you please clarify that you have tried revision r227958
O> > O> > O> > or higher?
O> > O> > O> 
O> > O> > O> My source tree is r227960. I do not see "can't allocate llinfo" messages, just "in_scrubprefix: err=51, prefix delete failed"
O> > O> > 
O> > O> > Can you please obtain backtrace to determine which codepath causes error. Patch
O> > O> > attached.
O> > O> 
O> > O> Sure, here it is:
O> > O> 
O> > O> in_scrubprefix+57c (?,?,?,?) ra 80435d28 sp a12980 sz 160
O> > O> in_ifinit+38 (?,?,?,?) ra 80437328 sp a12a20 sz 96
O> > O> in_control+bf8 (?,?,?,?) ra 8040ebb4 sp a12a80 sz 112
O> > O> ifioctl+1974 (17ee000,?,?,?) ra 804add20 sp a12af0 sz 192
O> > O> bootpc_init+1be0 (?,?,?,?) ra 802a642c sp a12bb0 sz 320
O> > O> mi_startup+20c (?,?,?,?) ra 80100134 sp a12cf0 sz 32
O> > 
O> > Compiler have inlined bootpc_adjust_interface & bootpc_fakeup_interface into
O> > bootpc_init so I can't determine which one is failing.
O> 
O> It's bootpc_adjust_interface

Can you please try r227790 (one before r227791) to check whether this printf from
in_scrubprefix() existed before. It looks to me that this message is harmless, and
the real problem is sosend() returning EINVAL. That is probably also fallout from
r227791, but I suspect that digging into in_scrubprefix() is a wrong direction.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111128093313.GM44498>