Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 11:23:58 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, John Robert LoVerso <john@loverso.southborough.ma.us>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Modules and sysctl tree Message-ID: <16581.944994238@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:42:25 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000@current1.whistle.com>, Jul ian Elischer writes: [sysctlfs] >Linux have basically done this in their procfs. And have recently started to wonder if that wasn't a mistake I've heard. I would regard sysctlfs as a grave mistake. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16581.944994238>