Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:24:35 +0000
From:      "Pokala, Ravi" <rpokala@panasas.com>
To:        Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: detecting hyperthreading
Message-ID:  <D123957A.12F6CA%rpokala@panasas.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F2E1411-B517-4BC8-AF61-BB15EE35083C@me.com>
References:  <D12358C5.12F652%rpokala@panasas.com> <9F2E1411-B517-4BC8-AF61-BB15EE35083C@me.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message-----
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com>
Date: 2015-03-09, Monday at 18:19
To: Ravi Pokala <rpokala@panasas.com>
Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: detecting hyperthreading

>I think that sysctl didn't fully control hyperthreading: you can disable
>it on the BIOS and FreeBSD never exported that information.  If you used
>that tunable, it would simply disable the Pentium 4 Hyperthreading.

I never tried to *change* it at runtime; I just used it's *existence* as
an indicator that HT was enabled. (Aside - why did it not exist at all
when HT was disabled, as opposed to always existing and just having
zero/non-zero values?)

-Ravi

>--
>Rui Paulo




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D123957A.12F6CA%rpokala>