Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 May 2009 20:55:10 +0200
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>
Cc:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, "Alexey V. Degtyarev" <alexey@renatasystems.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: binary package maintenance tool
Message-ID:  <4A05D18E.1010207@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0905040548s2946c7e0q807b3dc37e0aa392@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <49FACED3.2070009@bsdforen.de> <89135507@bb.ipt.ru>	 <20090504113919.GC93445@hs-4.renatasystems.org> <3cb459ed0905040548s2946c7e0q807b3dc37e0aa392@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Churanov wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Alexey V. Degtyarev <alexey@renatasystems.org>:
>>  I think that pkg_upgrade should respect a new package's dependency list
>>  and pre-fetch all the new dependencies before pkg_add.
> 

It does, if the dependencies are listed in the INDEX.

> My $0.02:
> 
> And calculate their size, and (in interactive mode) provide and option
> for a user to cancel download :-)
> 
> Alexander Churanov
> 

There is no interactive mode. I plan to implement one, but this will
be to perform roll-backs or resume interrupted upgrades and not be
part of normal operation.

The upgrading of packages is and will remain non-interactive.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A05D18E.1010207>