Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:33:56 +0000 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Yamaya Takashi <yamayan@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> Cc: "free >> Current FreeBSD" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Ports FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports include /etc/src.conf? i.e. graphics/libfpx Message-ID: <CAFHbX1Lg4w8g30DrcEbvm%2B6sFvTDpRAt7OouBBBUs1iiMaEL5g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <511B874A.7080901@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> References: <511B662C.7030602@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <511B874A.7080901@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi <yamayan@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote: > On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for >> instance >> >> # >> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ >> CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11 >> >> >> which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port >> grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options. >> >> As far a sI know, /etc/src.conf is ONLY for building the source tree of >> the operating system and make.conf is supposed to contain all stuff >> necessary for compiling both world and ports, but /etc/src.conf is world >> only. >> >> Am I wrong? >> >> Oliver >> > Yes. > Because files/Makefile.bsd includes <bsd.lib.mk>, > /etc/src.conf is included. > > src.conf(5) says: The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compilation of the FreeBSD source code, which is usually located in /usr/src. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1Lg4w8g30DrcEbvm%2B6sFvTDpRAt7OouBBBUs1iiMaEL5g>