Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 09:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Burton Sampley <bsampley@bsampley.vip.best.com> To: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> Cc: Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can SCO & FreeBSD coexist? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971007093831.8365C-100000@bsampley> In-Reply-To: <Pine.UW2.3.95.971007091932.12149D-100000@cedb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Dan, Thanks for the reply. I forgot to mention that on the second round I did try that, unfortunately I had the same results. I thought about creating a 'null' partition of about 10MB (actually an extended DOS partition) to create a 'buffer' between FBSD & SCO. Anybody think that might work, or am I wasting my time? On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Dan Busarow wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Burton Sampley wrote: > > I've been trying to get SCO Unixware 2.1.2 (the free version) and FBSD to > > coexist on the same system. So far they don't seem to like each other. > > I've had UnixWare and FreeBSD running on the same system (no MS though). > > When you allocate file system space for UnixWare leave a few meg free. > Don't know why it works but it does for me. > > Dan > -- > Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 > DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com > Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 > > - --------------- Burton Sampley bsampley@best.com or bsampley@haywire.csuhayward.edu PGP key available at http://www.best.com/~bsampley/pgp.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNDpnLnt2O8KJtMdBAQGOQQP/WrpX1t/YV/BhCb5XeuaFGrI6IL34/nKI AulkmmKolQWutMd8vaq9pRCh4o3qGxf7UIFF5rYH7gNYmmCDh+hAsqJ5MAsn6QYA i0lBcSfOsF7tL84czznP7yDV4UxNJ9m9MvxREMGwiaqCtHGudiUmtxrGK9OtpcOL 9ZknQosOp+g= =xn0q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971007093831.8365C-100000>