Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:57:09 +0200 From: Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal (Was: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-14:06.openssl) Message-ID: <CAHcXP%2BdnKwJJrarzjTA4_y9BOFCf5trPe9MAuM7KtCxhEQSU_w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAA3htvt6UXFvx3TgTXumkcEGe31_6uECPh5iQWg=1xjfpSzS2g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA3htvtb%2ByZRApEqJ41ue%2B6jB5Y_Une96SYyJRwQXBmQfRZbtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA3htvt6UXFvx3TgTXumkcEGe31_6uECPh5iQWg=1xjfpSzS2g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >* I understand that this is voluntary role and you have another (real *> >* life) responsibilities that=E2=80=99s why I'd like to propose an idea= of (at *> >* least partially) paid position of Security Officer, because we all *> >* need quick and efficient response in cases like that. *> > Having a paid Security Officer would not have made any difference. Do you care to elaborate on why it would not made any difference? And, if possible, also on what could do one, if you have any ideas about that? I have to say that I agree with Pawe=C5=82 fully, I would love to see such things being handled a way faster and to be better communicated, if they're 'on they way' and I also belive having paid Security Office could help - but I am happy to get to know why I might be under wrong impression. I also doesnt know if there's any chance of directing any monye from this year's budget towards improving that situation, but I also like the idea of 'targeted' funding, where people gets a chance to say where they want the money to be used, some sort of money democracy, I would say. Regards, Bl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcXP%2BdnKwJJrarzjTA4_y9BOFCf5trPe9MAuM7KtCxhEQSU_w>