Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:38:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191793] [NEW PORT] misc/fortune-mod-epictetus - quotes from Epictetus Message-ID: <bug-191793-13-bD9wP9yRRX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191793-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191793-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191793 --- Comment #2 from akosela@andykosela.com --- I did it on purpose. It seems the default behavior of fortune(6) is not as intended when dealing with additional fortune packages from ports. sun # pkg info -s fortune-mod-bofh fortune-mod-bofh-2.0_3 32.1KiB sun # fortune -f all ___% /usr/share/games/fortune ___% freebsd-tips ___% murphy ___% fortunes ___% startrek ___% gerrold.limerick ___% zippy ___% limerick Without first exporting FORTUNE_PATH all those additional fortune files will not be searched when using 'all' option and I don't think that explicitly exporting this variable is the cleanest thing to do here. Your thoughts? Maybe we should patch fortune(6) so that it searches through /usr/local/share/games/fortune also by default? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191793-13-bD9wP9yRRX>