Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:43:37 +0900
From:      NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PAO Integration? 
Message-ID:  <199812110543.OAA04099@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 17:01:56 PST." <199812110101.RAA01409@dingo.cdrom.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If you want to bring PAO up to date, you should be looking at the 
> generic resource manager in sys/kern/subr_rman.c and the way that it 
> is integrated within the new bus architecture.

I looked sys/kern/subr_rman.c, generic resource manager is quite
correct. It is very necessary.

Today's resource manager on PAO is quick and dirty hack, I
agree. Because, until now we development 2.2-stable base and
resource manager is necessary soon.

In the future, we want to change generic resource manager base code.

Does other PAO developer has different opinion?

> If Garrett hasn't already contacted the entire PAO group, consider this 
> a formal request; if you're a PAO developer at all, and you're 

Sorry, I don't know. I will ask other PAO developer.

--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
	y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
	nakagawa@jp.FreeBSD.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812110543.OAA04099>