Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0300 (BRT)
From:      "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS - thanks
Message-ID:  <73a41d4b72d62b0bfe3d0fb7206376a8.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090709112512.GA44158@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>
References:  <20090709112512.GA44158@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the
> developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real.
>
> And to everyone who provided helpful comments in the
> last couple of days.
>
> I had to delete and rebuild my zpool to switch from a
> 12-disk raidz2 to two 6-disk ones, but yesterday I could
> replace the raw devices with glabel devices and practice
> replacing a failed disk at the same time. ;-)
>
> So now we have this setup:
>
> 	NAME               STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
> 	zfs                ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	  raidz2           ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk100  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk101  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk102  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk103  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk104  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk105  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	  raidz2           ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk106  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk107  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk108  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk109  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk110  ONLINE       0     0     0
> 	    label/disk111  ONLINE       0     0     0
>
> which will get another enclosure with 6 750-GB-disks, soon.
>
> I really like the way I can manage storage from the operating
> system without propriatary controller management software or
> even rebooting into the BIOS.
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick

I've always been curious about this. is said not good to have many disks
in one pool. ok then. but this layout you're using in here will have the
same effect as the twelve disks in only one pool ? (the space here is the
sum of both pools ?)

thanks,

matheus

-- 
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73a41d4b72d62b0bfe3d0fb7206376a8.squirrel>