Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:54:16 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com, avg@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: looking for error codes
Message-ID:  <CEB5BE4D-5F52-4A64-A22F-168D2BE40CEA@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d96d545.e/wWTIUATgk2CGjt%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <4D95E162.40605@FreeBSD.org> <F98114A0-0C00-46EF-BD0C-E48F97FFF3E1@bsdimp.com> <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AEB52F1950BB@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <4D95ECDE.1020504@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTik_ypKnZPn1TXT6LwNH%2BX1tO2eu0w@mail.gmail.com> <4d96d545.e/wWTIUATgk2CGjt%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:50 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>=20
>> With respect to my knowledge , no one of the operating systems
>> has a facility to separate read-only and modifiable parts ...
>=20
> SunOS 4 had a partial solution to this, by rearranging the FS layout
> so that /usr could be mounted read-only (and often, from a server --
> IIRC a single /usr could be shared among multiple diskless clients).
> They used quite a few symlinks so that things could be found in
> their accustomed places although actually located elsewhere.  The
> scheme was fairly well described in the SunOS 4 manual set; granted
> _finding_ a SunOS 4 manual set these days may be a challenge :)

FreeBSD can do this too.  In fact, NanoBSD relies heavily on having most =
of the system mounted read-only, and has MFS partitions for /etc and =
/var.

Warner





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CEB5BE4D-5F52-4A64-A22F-168D2BE40CEA>