Date: Wed, 20 Aug 97 00:09:11 +0200 From: Ben Stuyts <benst@terminus.stuyts.nl> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs keeps putting src/contrib/tcl/library/http1.0 back in Message-ID: <199708192209.AAA06905@daneel.stuyts.nl> In-Reply-To: <199708192148.PAA07476@rocky.mt.sri.com> References: <199708191952.VAA06781@daneel.stuyts.nl> <199708192055.OAA07251@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199708192128.XAA06872@daneel.stuyts.nl> <199708192148.PAA07476@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Nate Williams wrote: > > Slight side note: However, this means that 'make update' in /usr/src is > > somewhat broken, because it always does a 'cvs -q update -P -d'. > > I could argue that 'make update' doesn't belong in the Makefile, but the > other part is that it's assumed that anyone using the system is tracking > -current, so this works there since developers never use TAGS in their > development trees. :) :) :) :) Well, I'm tracking everything. I need -stable at the office, and I want to go smp (i.e. -current) soon at home. To continue the rant: Shouldn't /usr/src/Makefile on the RELENG_2_2 branch have the -r RELENG_2_2 in the make update target? (It has here now...) Would be a minor fix. Don't know if it would break something or somebody's habits though. Best regards, Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708192209.AAA06905>