Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:59:12 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Skip Ford <skip@menantico.com> Cc: Dag-Erling =?koi8-r?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: sbrk(2) broken Message-ID: <20080104135912.GB57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080104135438.GA788@menantico.com> References: <477C82F0.5060809@freebsd.org> <863ateemw2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org> <86wsqqaqbe.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080104110511.S77222@fledge.watson.org> <20080104135438.GA788@menantico.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--A/AdVN8FDkvpDdxN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:54:38AM -0500, Skip Ford wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > >Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > >>The right answer is presumably to introduce a new LIMIT_SWAP, which > > >>limits the allocation of anonymous memory by processes, and size it to > > >>something like 90% of swap space by default. > > > > > >Not a good solution on its own. You need a per-process limit as well,= =20 > > >otherwise a malloc() bomb will still cause other processes to fail=20 > > >randomly. > >=20 > > That was what I had in mind, the above should read RLIMIT_SWAP. >=20 > Are you referring to the implementation of RLIMIT_SWAP in the > overcommit-disable patch at: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/overcommit/index.html >=20 > ...or some other as yet unwritten implementation? That patch doesn't > currently do 90% of swap but easily can. That's been available for almos= t 3 > years now. I tested it at one point but not lately and it never went into > production. Do you, and others, have a problem with that implementation? Oh, I thought that I was the sole user of the patch. What problems did you encountered while testing it ? What you mean by "do 90% of swap" ? --A/AdVN8FDkvpDdxN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHfjuwC3+MBN1Mb4gRAgu6AJ0WRUc3vHQ9y+Xpk70YFOQZLoX+wwCggMq7 MRGydd9Q74RMjOes7k72EdE= =YVBD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A/AdVN8FDkvpDdxN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080104135912.GB57756>