Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:28:08 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of unionfs in -STABLE Message-ID: <20031109112808.GA70947@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031109112421.GA94746@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20031109085459.GA31751@regency.nsu.ru> <20031109112421.GA94746@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:24:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:54:59PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in > > (semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status > > in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject? > > > > Probably any information would be appreciated. > > Unchanged since the other times this topic has been discussed recently > - see the archives for extensive discussion. (Summary: it's possible > to avoid panicking if you carefully restrict the activities you do > with unionfs, but expect panics and possible filesystem corruption > while discovering those limits). Thanks, I'll investigate further. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031109112808.GA70947>