Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:11:32 -0700 From: "David Kirchner" <dpk@dpk.net> To: "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 Message-ID: <35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net> References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> <20060502180557.GA91762@xor.obsecurity.org> <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060502182302.GA92027@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/3/06, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > To summarize: at some point you do, indeed, have to ship something. You > have to choose a point where the least number of users will see regressio= ns > vs. the most number of users will see improvements. (Not everyone uses > quotas.) FWIW, the snapshot bugs, particularly those seen during background fscks, can affect every installation, although you're unlikely to see them unless your server panics or loses power (or in some way requires a fsck on boot).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7>