Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:02:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194060] graphics/qgis python support broken since gcc 4.8 was imported Message-ID: <bug-194060-13-w0ZU2tNq69@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194060-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194060-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194060 --- Comment #18 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> --- (In reply to Matthieu Volat from comment #17) > I don't think qgis 2.6 will fix that kind of problems (since it is > relatively FreeBSD/ports centric), and since the patch only affect the port > Makefile, it should not either affect it. I'm 100% happy since I can live > with a patched port tree, but this issue was resolved a while ago and maybe > it would be nice to push it to everybody? You are right. Most of the changes, which are in my last submitted patch (148661), is not relevant upstream. > On the other hand, delaying it until qgis 2.6 is commited seems a bit more > fuzzy, since we don't know how fast the port will be updated? I am working on an update towards 2.6.0 yet. But it could take some days, since I don't want to introduce new problems ;) > But great news btw, I guess I'll try to bump my local version and see what > happens :) I would suggest, that in the meantime, someone with a commit bit should bring this patch (148661) into the tree. Then I will prepare the update from 2.4.0 to 2.6.0 in a new bugzilla report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194060-13-w0ZU2tNq69>