Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:45:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads across processors Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980826194034.23324B-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <xzpyasbe6yt.fsf@olvaldi.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Aug 1998, Dag-Erling Coidan [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > Dave Glowacki <dglo@SSEC.WISC.EDU> writes: > > According to http://www.macosrumors.com/OSX.html MacOS X will already have > > a version of BSD built in and a command line interface will be available. > > macosrumors.com make a living spreading startling but false news. Do > you read the National Enquirer to get the latest on geopolitics? I wouldn't say that. First of all, the core of Rhapsody is BSD 4.4. This is positive. What isn't known, is how much Rhapsody will make it into OS X, or even what will happen to Rhapsody. People are running Rhapsody know. It has basically a full BSD like environment under a standard MacOS GUI. Cool stuff, but the current developer release (at least the one I've been allow to see) of Rhapsody has zero backwards compatibility stuff in it. There was even a Rhapsody port to x86 (imagin Mac GUI on Intel!), but Apple seems to have killed it. > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980826194034.23324B-100000>