Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:27:53 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Radim Kolar <hsn@filez.com> Subject: Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters Message-ID: <CADLo83-qVe4WSz83OYimwt%2BFWh6ojd8Tg8gREJfwpae7qU7Uiw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAL409KzKvGZofXuRhk4q2Y3pYGLwpODoboHOeh_OPKNMNAcJGQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <50017C97.3050200@filez.com> <CADLo83_a=qOqTgGQF%2BLSYyGDaJoT6B2vF9JGV=a2ZHRXRyR6Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL409KzKvGZofXuRhk4q2Y3pYGLwpODoboHOeh_OPKNMNAcJGQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 July 2012 16:24, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: >> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr. > > One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets > automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a committer, it is > not automatically unassigned if the person is missing for a few > months, and other committers ignore the PR because it is already > assigned. > > This only happened once to me, but it took 6 months for another > committer to notice it. And that was pretty fast, comparing to, say > ports/154456 [1], which is open since 2011-02. > > Is automatic unassignment possible? Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable. You can feel free to bring it up here if you think that's happened. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-qVe4WSz83OYimwt%2BFWh6ojd8Tg8gREJfwpae7qU7Uiw>