Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:22:46 +0100
From:      Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>
To:        fjwcash@gmail.com, trociny@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Any success stories for HAST + ZFS?
Message-ID:  <E1Q5cRC-0000iz-JX@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=zXX93Tzd1fYq3bJ4BEuvUf43y=94fT3rXd6j9@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The other 5% of the time, the hastd crashes occurred either when
> importing the ZFS pool, or when running multiple parallel rsyncs to
> the pool.  hastd was always shown as the last running process in the
> backtrace onscreen.

This is what I am seeing - did you manage to reproduce this with the patch,
or does it fix the issue for you ? Am doing more test now, with only a single
hast device to see if it is stable. Am Ok to run without mirroring across
hast devices for now, but wouldnt like to do so long term!

-pete.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1Q5cRC-0000iz-JX>