Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:45:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210155] textproc/expat2 & textproc/linux-*-expat: Expat issues CVE-2012-6702 and CVE-2016-5300 Message-ID: <bug-210155-4077-9fj6lArxxo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210155-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210155-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210155 John Hein <z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com --- Comment #9 from John Hein <z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com> --- Is undocumenting a vulnerability like this the right thing to do? There's nothing to say a 3rd party linux package doesn't need linux expat and might= use it in a way that triggers the vulnerability. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210155-4077-9fj6lArxxo>