Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 03:31:02 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: dima@best.net Cc: guido@gvr.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc master.passwd Message-ID: <19981203033102.A4024@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <199812030003.QAA14948@burka.rdy.com>; from dima@best.net on Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:03:02PM -0800 References: <19981203024716.A91719@nagual.pp.ru> <199812030003.QAA14948@burka.rdy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:03:02PM -0800, Dima Ruban wrote: > Andrey A. Chernov writes: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 01:35:50PM -0800, Dima Ruban wrote: > > > > I think, it's bullshit change. I use operator account to do backups for > > > > Please note that I am not against having operator as valid shell account, > > but minimal user setup should be commited first to activate operator user. > > I.e. something like /operator directory with minimal .cshrc, .login etc > > (like for /root) must be commited first. > > Then why don't you fix it? Why break it even more? > > (Yes, it might be a good idea to have /operator) I fix it in opposite direction, because I don't need operator account at all. Since you have and need and can test operator account, you are welcome to do this few etc/Makefile, mtree and so on changes which well fit general valid operator account. In either direction it must be fixed and not stay as was. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981203033102.A4024>