Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:22:08 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Bye <freebsd@slightlystrange.org>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvsup
Message-ID:  <20041018172208.GB5179@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <57979.192.168.0.1.1098116798.squirrel@192.168.0.1>
References:  <ef60af09041018084356e2b5c3@mail.gmail.com> <200410181646.44654.howells@kde.org> <ef60af090410180905daed1eb@mail.gmail.com> <4173EAE2.9050001@pragmeta.com> <57979.192.168.0.1.1098116798.squirrel@192.168.0.1>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:26:38PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:
> > I had to create a symlink for /lib/libm.so.2
> > and point it to /lib/libm.so.3 for cvsup to run.
> 
> I hit this one this morning.  I tackled by setting this in /etc/libmap.conf:
> 
> [/usr/local/bin/cvsup]
> libm.so.3    libm.so.2

What is the output of 'uname -a'?  How is everyone running into this when
the 5.3 Beta's (and 6-CURRENT) have /lib/libm.so.3?
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018172208.GB5179>