Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:37:37 +0100 From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tplink TL-WR1043ND access point is now ready (was Re: svn commit: r227926 - head/sys/mips/conf) Message-ID: <15200024.qyaoOkNKT3@snifi> In-Reply-To: <F7C01918-F1E8-41A6-841F-46109F8BCB5E@lassitu.de> References: <CAJ-Vmo=aLVTgA10UAg=KQMyybeLmBjF75qXdpmFAkqdU9GzJvA@mail.gmail.com> <F7C01918-F1E8-41A6-841F-46109F8BCB5E@lassitu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dnia sobota, 26 listopada 2011 00:01:34 Stefan Bethke pisze: > Is there a read-write filesystem for the flash, or are we limited to an > archive in the cfg flash partition? For now it's only this cfg part. > I see that you went to some lengths creating your own config framework. Why > did you choose to not use the standard? I think that size and eventually building speed(during wireless development) > I haven't looked at nanobsd in ages, and I did see in the last status report > that there is another attempt at creating an OpenWrt-like setup. I'm > currently running about six or seven OpenWrt routers (mostly at the > extended family), and I'm interested in eventually replacing OpenWrt with > FreeBSD. Any guesses where a trimmed-down but fully functional (incl. > ports) distribution might emerge? NanoBSD is fine for many setups but it needed some tweaks to make crosscompiled images and it needs space which is rather short on such devices. greetings, Maciej Milewski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15200024.qyaoOkNKT3>