Date: 11 Mar 2001 21:50:17 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp@bank-pedersen.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part) Message-ID: <xzpelw4hvxy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Matthew Jacob's message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:48:06 -0800 (PST)" References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111247490.29879-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes: > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you > use vinum. Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpelw4hvxy.fsf>