Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:55:34 +0700
From:      Edho P Arief <edhoprima@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Cc:        Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: tmux(1) in base
Message-ID:  <a3780c060909220155i366aa65x8b022eec8157595c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090922091455.208864fktn4do1c8@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090921112917.GA89971@freebsd.org> <20090921113556.GX95398@hoeg.nl> <1253537983.1757.5.camel@localhost> <1253540785.2134.85.camel@strangepork.london.mintel.ad> <20090922091455.208864fktn4do1c8@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
<Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote:
> To get back on-topic to the initial stuff: as a user of screen and a person
> which doesn't care if it is screen or tmux... I would prefer to not have
> anything like this in the base. It is not hard to install it on a machine,
> and if tmux there are frequent releases of tmux, it will always be outdated
> in FreeBSD and as such I would prefer to get it from ports.

IIUC, the intention is to replace window(1). Or you're suggesting to
remove window(1) from base, too?

-- 
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a3780c060909220155i366aa65x8b022eec8157595c>