Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 14:01:34 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@hilink.com.au> Subject: Re: misc/9500: `edithook' is not Y2K compliant Message-ID: <XFMail.990116140134.asmodai@wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990115173619.18735A-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15-Jan-99 Bill Fumerola wrote: > I'd like to point on the 'perhaps this is...' in my statment, I wasn't > trying to start a holy war. I'll also point out the people you mentioned > are our most represented users, if not the majority. Either way is fine, > I'm just wondering why you're using an obscure format, and I guess the > answer is "it shows we're not biased towards one format". Funny that ye missed to mention the most obvious of all answers Bill ;) YYYY/MM/DD (/serial number) is the way that's the best for source control and logging, because of the speed in which the numerics increase and change the number(s) before it... But then again, I don't think I really have to explain that to ye =) --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven A veil of smoke is what I am, asmodai(at)wxs.nl I wait and I wait... Network/Security Specialist <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>; BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990116140134.asmodai>