Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Dec 1994 07:33:53 -0500
From:      moto@cs.cmu.edu
To:        Robert Badaracco <rjb@intac.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ethertalk/CAP 
Message-ID:  <6127.788531633@GS81.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 27 Dec 1994 00:34:12 -0500. <Pine.SUN.3.90.941227002643.2736A-100000@nile.intac.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Bob" == Robert Badaracco <rjb@intac.com> writes:

Bob> I've been thinking about using FreeBSD for use as a server to run
Bob> CAP (Columbia U's Appletalk server package). The current release
Bob> of CAP and it's patches indicate that a bridge or router is
Bob> necessary to encapsulate Appletalk packets within IP under most
Bob> BSD releases. Does FreeBSD 2.0 offer *native* Ethertalk? So far,
Bob> the only commercial package that does, from my limited research,
Bob> is Sun's Solaris.

Making use of BPF, CAP can run on FreeBSD box in native EtherTalk
(Phase 1). It worked for me with FreeBSD 1.1, and presumably with 2.0
as well which I don't test actually. Unfortunately, CAP on BPF had a
performance problem. I know that some guys were working to solve this
problem. I hope their work is incorporated into the CAP official
patch.

==============================================================================
Motonori Shindou       Carnegie Mellon University       SCS Graduate Student
              e-mail: moto@cs.cmu.edu,  NiftyServe: GEG04056
WWW: http://www.cs.cmu.edu:8001:/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/moto/WWW/moto-home.html
                   TEL: 412-362-9636   FAX: 412-362-9634
==============================================================================



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6127.788531633>