Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jun 1996 08:34:57 -0400
From:      "Jacob M. Parnas" <jparnas@jparnas.cybercom.net>
To:        Bob Loftus <bobster@primenet.com>
Cc:        "Aaron D. Gifford" <agifford@infowest.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bsdi-users@bsdi.com
Subject:   Re: Adaptec2940UW vs. BusLogicBT-958 (opinions?) 
Message-ID:  <199606121235.IAA12473@jparnas.cybercom.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:35:39 PDT. <Pine.BSD.3.91.960611162414.19152A-100000@usr06.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message <Pine.BSD.3.91.960611162414.19152A-100000@usr06.primenet.com>you write:
>I believe that Paul Vixie has expounded quite masterfully on this topic 
>in the past, check the bsdi-users archive @ nexial.nl as I recall it 
>doesn't really matter, and you can't possibly keep the scsi bus busy 
>enough to warrant it. "Wide SCSI is just for those suffering from 
>spec-envy." "Wide SCSI has lovely marketing, I guess. Everybody wants it, 
>nobody needs it." -- Paul Vixie
>Have fun...

Would you please elaborate a bit on the logic?  I don't see why with up to
15 devices, you couldn't fill up 40MB/sec for a fast/wide/ultra SCSI III bus?
Especially with some raids counting as one large SCSI device?

Trying to understand, Jacob



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606121235.IAA12473>