Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:05:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 tap.4 src/sys/net if_tap.c Message-ID: <20050413120523.Y3762@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <20050413170217.P95037@fledge.watson.org> References: <200504130030.j3D0UJDN082846@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050413170217.P95037@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: > Is there any reason to require suser() at all for open, given that our > devfs permissions are conservative? Maybe we should remove that suser() > and add a couple for specific tapioctl() calls that are more sensitive? Its an exclusive open device. -- 10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050413120523.Y3762>