Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:43:14 +0300
From:      Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Lauri Watts <lauri@kde.org>
Cc:        Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>, KDE FreeBSD List <kde-freebsd@lists.csociety.org>, FreeBSD Ports List <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [kde-freebsd] kdemultimedia stomps on graphics/mpeg-lib's .so    files
Message-ID:  <200207082343.14761@zappa.athame.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020708130422.46234G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020708130422.46234G-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 08 July 2002 20:06, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Lauri Watts wrote:
> > The only application we've managed to come up with that actually
> > uses it today is Gimp (however, the gimp-devel port also uses it.)
>
> Ok, my suggestion of renaming the KDE mpeg lib was based on the
> assumption that other software relied on the mpeg-lib in ports, and
> that it was "the" mpeg lib.  If that's not the case, then I withdraw
> the suggestion. However, it does open up another question: what do
> other systems link gimp1 against?
>
> If gimp1 *really* needs that specifc mpeg library, and it's the only
> software that does, the temptation would be to build it as part of
> the gimp build, and statically link it into gimp, solving the problem
> :-).

I did a thorough check of the ports tree, and the only ports that use 
graphics/mpeg-lib are graphics/gimp1 and graphics/gimp-devel

It would appear (I've not checked completely) that it would be 
relatively straightforward to patch all three ports to avoid this 
naming conflict.

As for other systems, at least the Ximian gimp packages for RedHat do 
not appear to use this plugin/library.

In fact, from my tests here with gimp (on FreeBSD, with no library 
conflicts), the plugin actually _fails_ to load about 95% of the MPEG 
files I have, which leads me to think that it's pretty much a waste of 
time worrying about it. Of course, other people will have a different 
opinion on that.

A.

-- 
Andy Fawcett      |   "In an open world without walls and fences,
andy@athame.co.uk |      we wouldn't need Windows and Gates."
tap@lspace.org    |                              -- anon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207082343.14761>