Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:56:43 +0900 From: Svyatoslav Lempert <svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4 Message-ID: <CAERaTk_eNN9qTGjtGvEsDGZgmBXTz4wgt0BEoZfC4mVjpLct8w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120310092217.00007cfc@unknown> References: <1331226987.9802.19.camel@work> <20120309134425.Horde.RIrSbJjmRSRPWfspeJi2piA@webmail.leidinger.net> <20120309134433.GX23354@e-new.0x20.net> <20120309153952.Horde.n8gTQpjmRSRPWhY4YaaoHcA@webmail.leidinger.net> <CAERaTk9Ck4infypMnWuKWGU9rgmBwJqhv4tTv2yOBJP1NaztfA@mail.gmail.com> <20120310092217.00007cfc@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/3/10 Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>: >> >> # ./bash >> FATAL: kernel too old >> >> # file bash >> bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), >> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped >> >> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 >> compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.6.32 >> >> # ./bash >> Segmentation fault > > Can you please ktrace it and use linux_kdump to have a look what is the > most likely cause of this? It would be good to know what's missing in > the kernel. > ldconfig does not work too, any binary crashed, this file is first (it called by port installation script) # ktrace ./ldconfig Segmentation fault # kdump -f ktrace.out 69021 ktrace RET ktrace 0 69021 ktrace CALL execve(0x7fffffffed97,0x7fffffffeb30,0x7fffffffeb40) 69021 ktrace NAMI "./ldconfig" 69021 ldconfig RET linux_olduname 0 69021 ldconfig CALL linux_newuname(0xffffda4a) 69021 ldconfig RET linux_newuname 0 69021 ldconfig CALL linux_brk(0) 69021 ldconfig RET linux_brk 135380992/0x811c000 69021 ldconfig CALL linux_brk(0x811cd40) 69021 ldconfig RET linux_brk 135384384/0x811cd40 69021 ldconfig CALL linux_set_thread_area(0xffffdc00) 69021 ldconfig RET linux_set_thread_area 0 69021 ldconfig PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL code=0x1 >> What do you think about the CentOS? It may be more optimal to look on >> CentOS 6 userland port? > > Any long-term release looks better than what we have now. A RPM based > one (like CentOS) looks more easy to port because of the existing RPM > infrastructure, than any non-RPM based one. I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run without problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18, I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like emulators/linux_base-f10 there are all very similar) and send this as PR. -- Svyatoslav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAERaTk_eNN9qTGjtGvEsDGZgmBXTz4wgt0BEoZfC4mVjpLct8w>