Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:29:41 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many binary packages are missing Message-ID: <20101013182941.GA6404@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=pP=dxQtwq4v%2B1ybzNHL1uhf5_n2c0sAj6MP_k@mail.gmail.com> References: <4CB5E081.8070809@rawbw.com> <20101013175107.GA74687@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4CB5F3BA.6050801@rawbw.com> <AANLkTi=pP=dxQtwq4v%2B1ybzNHL1uhf5_n2c0sAj6MP_k@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:06:55PM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: >=20 > I think it would be nice if at least one binary package was available with > the most "typical" dependencies. For example, I am not a native English > speaker, but I would not mind using the English version OO if I could > download it as a binary package... Just my $0.02... =2E . . without Java, given Java's licensing restrictions. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAky1+pUACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXejQCg7UuEju+0AXb8Uhf+jVAZxT59 CoMAoMiQ/U4hNwYswNezkYyT95yzxUnq =h+1U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101013182941.GA6404>