Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:41:58 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: William Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable ot Current ?? Message-ID: <19991104104158.C28581@chuggalug.clues.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911041030310.25540-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>; from Doug Rabson on Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 10:31:06AM %2B0000 References: <XFMail.991003204315.wwoods@cybcon.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911041030310.25540-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 10:31:06AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, William Woods wrote: > > > What do you guys run/reccomend to be most "Alpha friendly", 3.3-stable or > > 4.0-current ? > > Probably 4.0-current works better for alphas right now. It certainly > supports more of the latest hardware. That was certainly my experiance 2-4 months ago, snapshots are easier to locate for current and I suspect there are more 4.x alphas than 3.x ATM the only production machine I know of runs a current (probably not recomended) -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991104104158.C28581>