Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:08:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gnat/files patch-ab Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0804080907310.14648@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20080408090759.GB83752@FreeBSD.org> References: <200804080033.m380XK19007886@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080408090759.GB83752@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:33:20AM +0000, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> deischen 2008-04-08 00:33:20 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Added files: >> lang/gnat/files patch-ab >> Log: >> Use setenv to add an environment variable instead of putenv. In 7.0, >> putenv() does not copy the supplied environment stringi, but gcc/gnat >> was free()ing the memory expecting that it would be copied. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.7 +20 -0 ports/lang/gnat/files/patch-ab (new) > > It is strongly discouraged to name new patch files as `patch-??', we > prefer `patch-path_to_the_file' pattern nowadays (for a while already, I > should say). Yes, I've seen that, but this port uses patch-?? and I wanted consistency. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0804080907310.14648>