Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:12:34 +0100
From:      Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GnuPG + FreeBSD 5.3 = intermitent memory warning
Message-ID:  <87fz1gj3ul.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050103195441.45311O-100000@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:58:01 %2B0000 (GMT)")
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050103195441.45311O-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:58:01 +0000 (GMT), Robert Watson said:

> I wonder if it would make sense for gnupg to print additional error
> information when printing the insecure memory warning?  Specifically, to

I'll look at it.  IIRC, we need to save away the errno because
printing of the message might get deferred.

  Werner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87fz1gj3ul.fsf>