Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:21:04 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: dev.null@funbox.demon.co.uk, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposed secure-level 4 patch Message-ID: <19990621142104.X63035@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199906210518.PAA15232@cheops.anu.edu.au>; from Darren Reed on Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 03:18:34PM %2B1000 References: <376D27ED.0180@funbox.demon.co.uk> <199906210518.PAA15232@cheops.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 03:18:34PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > How about a bit vector defining which ports can and can't be bound from > non-root below 1024 ? > > a 256 byte array doesn't sound too bad does it ? Why haven't I seen the magic words of 'Merge from OpenBSD' in a commit related to this yet? ;-) (OpenBSD has support for this, and the patches didn't look scarily large) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990621142104.X63035>