Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:16:57 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name Message-ID: <44AE0A69.20101@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20060707014846.GB500@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <44AC5D39.4010502@gmx.de> <20060706011015.GA6677@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <44ACD177.1000204@gmx.de> <20060706152403.GA13815@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <44AD3495.9090603@gmx.de> <20060707014846.GB500@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>> Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>>>> I normally run the command >>>>>> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< >>>>>> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: >>>>>> >>>>>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00) >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. >>>>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is >>>>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's >>>>> just plain bogus. >>>>> >>>> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? >>> I don't know. How did you install it? >> # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz > > It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the > package. It looks like the package is incorrect. > Yes, that fixed it. So I guess the FreeBSD foundation is at fault.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44AE0A69.20101>