Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:39:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Pablo Ruggia <pruggia@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Freebsd 6.0 Release Time Message-ID: <430A4612.2070803@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <200508222328.24735@harrymail> References: <200508222109.j7ML9uG6016071@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200508222328.24735@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emanuel Strobl wrote: >What's TBA? > >But I'd like to advise Pablo to go with 6.0-RC, or even with BETA3 if >neccessarry, tracking a stable or RELEASE branch in FreeBSD is very easy >and worth the building mechanisms, especially if you have 10 similar >machines to maintain. You have a very convenient way to keep security >risks minimalised and in almost any environment you'll benefit from the >RELENG_6 performance and hardware enhancements. > > > That's TBD (= to be decided), not TBA. Jerry mispelled it. I would also use BETA3 or RC. It is very easy to upgrade same machines. One can build an install disc on one of the machines and upgrade via sysinstall with that disc. There's no need to do a 'make buildworld' on each machine. Cheers, Gabor Kovesdan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?430A4612.2070803>