Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 06:38:41 -0500 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: standards@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, des@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net Message-ID: <AE6B564A-4E24-48B4-906D-F0414CB7FC46@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <yge3bs8ttcl.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <ygemzrcgnej.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <200505041529.36826.peter@wemm.org> <ygell6ojsef.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20050509.104234.71141880.imp@bsdimp.com> <yge3bs8ttcl.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 27, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, >>>>>> On Mon, 09 May 2005 10:42:34 -0600 (MDT) >>>>>> Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> said: >> Are you suggest when to remove padding? Since the major of libc was >> bumped already in 6-CURRENT, it may better to wait 7-CURRENT. > > imp> We've generally not worried compatibility in the 'rough and > tumble' > imp> world of FreeBSD current. So unless there's a problem in the > upgrade > imp> path, I think that we safely omit them. > > I'll commit the attached change to nuke padding. It will break ABI > compatibility on 64 bit arch. So, I'm planning bumping major of > affected shlibs. Please review it. It isn't clear to me that bumping the libraries' version number in - CURRENT is necessary, but I have no objection, either. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AE6B564A-4E24-48B4-906D-F0414CB7FC46>