Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:44:58 +0800 From: David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re[2]: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_timer.c Message-ID: <13914214859.20010313134458@viasoft.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <3AACF6E9.6730B7AE@elischer.org> References: <200103012211.f21MBEv96903@freefall.freebsd.org> <11619657876.20010312141256@viasoft.com.cn> <20010312081100.P78851@prism.flugsvamp.com> <3AACF6E9.6730B7AE@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Julian, Tuesday, March 13, 2001, 12:18:49 AM, you wrote: JE> Jonathan Lemon wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:12:56PM +0800, David Xu wrote: >> > Hello Jonathan, >> > >> > Friday, March 02, 2001, 6:11:14 AM, you wrote: >> > >> > JL> jlemon 2001/03/01 14:11:14 PST >> > >> > JL> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) >> > JL> sys/netinet tcp_timer.c >> > JL> Log: >> > JL> MFC: another component of TCP newreno I overlooked in last commit. >> > >> > JL> Revision Changes Path >> > JL> 1.34.2.4 +6 -1 src/sys/netinet/tcp_timer.c >> > >> > what is status of SACK implemention? >> >> I'm not sure that anyone is working on one at this time. When I >> investigated the issue around 1-2 years ago, I was shown some >> statisics indicating that less than 30% of the web actually used >> SACK, so I wasn't sufficiently motivated to do the work. JE> Msoft w98 and on use SAC >> -- >> Jonathan sigh, does it mean FreeBSD get behind in some TCP/IP features? I know Linux and OpenBSD support SACK, and possible NetBSD. -- David Xu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13914214859.20010313134458>